Friday, September 30, 2011

Why Torah Defeats Communism


I have been asked why in the course of teaching Anti-Communism do I focus so much upon the Jewish people. The answer is simple: Because Marx did.

Though his goal was the eradication of all religion, he did not savage Christianity. In fact, a quick scour of the Internet and Google Books will show not only that Marx had a kindly view towards the Christians (insofar as he believed they were “this close” to being communist) but also that Marxism has its Christian admirers.

The Jews were his target. According to Marx, Jews were a backwards people. His central idea towards capitalism is that Jews invented it, whether through Judaism (which he considered money-centered), or, more deeply, through Jewish nature, i.e., their DNA. His further plank is that capitalism is spread to non-Jews via contact with Jews (naturally, this is both mystical and unscientific, two adjectives the Marxists supposedly hate). Since capitalism is ostensibly the scourge of all ills, there must be a “solution.” We know where that leads.

But why did Marx concentrate on the Jewish religion? To discredit it. It’s one thing to say that the Jewish people have particular traits described as (and continue to be characterized as) “dangerous.” Such philosophy can usually be dismissed as baseless hatred, that is, bigotry. It’s quite different to say in a pseudo-scientific manner that all society, including the Jews, can be “saved” from their Judaism (a basic tenet of Marx’s contribution to On the Jewish Question). This is, in their view, “kindly.” But let’s be clear: Marx knew that the end of Judaism would be the end of Torah. The core of Judaism is Torah. If you destroy the Jewish religion, you destroy Torah. If you destroy Torah, God’s Law is destroyed for a great many (perhaps all) people. This is a difficult thing for non-Jews to understand, but Marx understood it quite well.

Now, you may ask, what did Marx know? (1) The core of Jesus Christ is Torah. Jesus defeated Satan with Torah (in the wilderness). He kept Torah (for example, Passover). He taught Torah (in the temples). He condemned anyone who would mess with Torah (Matthew 5:19, et al). If you destroy Torah, you leave only an empty husk of Christ. Christianity might continue, but it would be based on ideas rather than facts. Destroy Torah, destroy Christianity as a true religion. (2) The foundation of the United States Constitution is Torah. “Judeo-Christian” values are all Torah. “Love thy neighbor” is Torah. The Ten Commandments is Torah. American jurisprudence (“innocent until proven guilty”) is Torah-based. Thrift and preparedness is Torah. Freedom and liberty is Torah (the First Commandment). Is it Christian also? Sure, but Torah came well before Christ. Jesus always quoted and upheld Torah (and the prophets, and Proverbs, etc). If you discredit Torah, the Constitution, and therefore freedom, can be torn to shreds. (3) The foundation of Islam is Torah. Islamic law is, like Christian ordinance, a product of Torah. You may consider Islamic law as the “aggressive half-brother” of Torah in the same manner that Ishmael was (and is) the “wild man” half-brother to Isaac. Marx’s idea was certainly to destroy “Mohammedanism” by disassembling Moses, Torah, and Judaism.

What about Buddhism? I've said elsewhere that perhaps Buddha learned from Jesus, but I see I was incorrect. Buddha lived 500 years before Christ. However, saying that Christ possibly taught Buddha was another way for me to say that Buddha believed Torah. Did he? In a manner of speaking, yes. Not in rules and distinctions per se, but there is no escaping the “first cause” God. See this link for more:

http://torahandmeditation.weebly.com/judaism-and-buddhism-clarified.html

And although Buddhism in non-theistic, there is no escaping the basic pre-existing truth of Torah. See a Buddhist’s example here:

http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/buddhismjudaism/

As before, let me say that my goal is not to make you a Jew (as I am) but to explain why Marx was so dead-set on the destruction of Judaism, why Hitler tried to exterminate the Jews, why Marxists and Nazis today blame “the Jews” for banking cartels and economic woes, why Israel is under assault, why “Zionism” is so vilified, why the United Nations has a double standard regarding Middle East conflict. Racism and genocide is the outcome, but the goal was and is to unhinge the world from Torah.

We are only at the beginning. We now see open revolution against our Constitution, the bravery to speak treason in the streets, the rampant attitude to covet and steal private property. This is evil. This is antichrist. This is anti-Torah. This is communism.

Lesson 3: Marx Begins a Serious Attack on Religion (1835-1843)

I hold weekly meetings for interested parties here in Hendersonville, NC. This is a synopsis from our third meeting.

Synopsis of Week 3 Meeting:

1. In 1836, at 18 years of age, Karl Marx became engaged to a Prussian baroness (whom he married in 1843). This relationship broke several taboos of the time: (1) Gentile aristocrat/Jew, (2) upper class/middle class, (3) older woman/younger man. Likely, his knowing involvement in breaking such barriers caused his revolutionary blood to bubble.

2. Marx soon thereafter became involved in a group known as Young Hegelians. These studied German philosopher Hegel, especially the concept of the “dialectic” (radical social change through synthesis of competing ideas, that is, by revolutionary means, whether natural or man-caused) but were critical of his metaphysical approach. Simply, they liked Hegel’s ideas but detested his approach. One might say that the Young Hegelian utilization of Hegel’s dialectic permitted them to circumvent its founder (their actions perhaps even based on “Do as thou wilt,” the motto of Satanism [see Synopsis - Week 2]).

The Hegelian dialectic is not only normative for communist pabulum but is also used in other types of mind control, everything from office politics to world domination. In large part, the common use of the dialectic rests on a principle of blame, but with specious, confusing, and often contradictory arguments. It is a shifting of responsibility for events. It is conscious passive-aggressiveness.

It is also the basis for the Overton Window, which changes mass paradigm to accept something formerly unacceptable, usually by offering a choice between terrible and not-so-bad, without ever acknowledging as viable third and fourth choices.

This is the seed of communist revolutionary strategy.

Try this link for more on Hegel:

http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html

and/or,

http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/simple-explanation-of-hegelian-dialectic-method/

3. In 1841, Marx wrote his doctoral thesis, The Difference Between the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature. This piece is described as “a daring and original piece of work in which he set out to show that theology must yield to the superior wisdom of philosophy.” This reveals a major effect of Hegel on Marx: That religion is of the past and that man’s intellect must rule in the present. The Hegelian dialectic deemed to Marx that such transpiration of events is not only necessary but natural (even if Hegel himself did not espouse such practical end). In one manner, all of German philosophy (read Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, even Luther) is dangerous, deriving from particularly nihilistic cultural, even ethnic, roots. That Marx misconstrued Hegel from the Russian view (though Marx was by birth Jewish) is evidenced by Hitler’s ethnic slant on the Teutonic superman (master racist) mythos and resulting ethos.

For more on Hitler’s connection to Hegel, see (for example):

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/bb970219.htm

and

http://www.blupete.com/Literature/Biographies/Philosophy/Hegel.htm

In modern times, the application of this Overton Window offensive can be seen in the Internet film sensation Zeitgeist. While purporting to be a “new” way to combat the forces of evil, it is really just another world domination scheme (couched in other cloth). As a matter of fact, “zeitgeist” (though this term was coined in the 1700’s) is most associated with Hegel’s philosophy (dialectic) on history. See, for example, here:

http://gary-lilienthal.suite101.com/hegelian-zeitgeist-philosophy-statism--human-rights-violations-a229308

Another anti-theist use of Overton Window via Hegelian dialectic is through cultural characters like Bill Maher, whose constant attacks on religion cause some to view authoritarianism (as compared to religious liberty) to be comical. It is also by this dialectic that Maher, in order to ostensibly appear fair, pits one religion against another while simultaneously bashing that “victim” (more peaceful) religion against the wall. By strangling and manipulating vocabulary and language cues, clever dialectics can be built that do not cause doubt (which in reality is good) as much as malfeasance. For it is not the cause of freedom that one like Maher espouses, but that of rigid control.

4. “Marx moved to the city of Cologne, Germany in 1842, where he began writing for the radical newspaper Rheinische Zeitung, expressing his increasingly socialist views on politics. He criticized the governments of Europe and their policies, but also liberals and other members of the socialist movement whose ideas he thought were ineffective or outright anti-socialist. The paper eventually attracted the attention of the Prussian government censors, who checked every issue for potentially seditious material before it could be printed. Marx said, ‘Our newspaper has to be presented to the police to be sniffed at, and if the police nose smells anything un-Christian or un-Prussian, the newspaper is not allowed to appear.’ After the paper published an article strongly criticizing the monarchy in Russia, the Russian Tsar Nicholas I, an ally of the Prussian monarchy, requested that the Rheinische Zeitung be banned. The Prussian government shut down the paper in 1843. Marx wrote for the Young Hegelian journal, the Deutsche Jahrb├╝cher, in which he criticized the censorship instructions issued by Prussian King Friedrich Wilhelm IV. His article was censored and the newspaper closed down by the authorities shortly after.” (source: Wikipedia)

Historically, Prussia had been involved in the French Revolutionary period, specifically aligning with the monarchies against the peasant citizenry (not that it worked). Naturally, French mob rule cannot be equated with our own American Revolution, but one can see that Marx’s affections lay with that oppressed group of proletariat. Prussia was the dominant power in Marx’s time, which fits the schematic that revolutionaries should target such dominance. This is evidenced in current times by their persistent attacks on free nations such as the United States or Israel.

Note that Karl Marx’s chosen environment, the Christian Prussian Empire, was almost a theocracy. Nevertheless, if we understand the Hegelian dialectic employed, it is apparent that religious persecution was never of interest to these radicals – it was only the ploy to distract one class and attract another. It was a game of power. This Hegelian energy is still today the primary driver of communist and other radical (including Islamic) movements.

5. The first goal of the Marxist is to set up, even before organizing, opposition to tyranny. Since tyranny has always been prevalent in human society, this is an easy foundation to lay. Basically, find a large enough group to call “victim” and blame the government (or other authority, such as “management”) for such oppression, even if the government has been compassionate beyond all bounds. Since society cannot accommodate every group with equality of results, there is always a faction looking for a savior.

The second goal is to create a network of compassion which exceeds the oppressive nature of the current living conditions. The 1960’s Black Panthers achieved their thankful base by providing food, legal services, and other necessities to an impoverished black community. They were pseudo-government (handouts are handouts). This radical organization learned well the Marxist-Hegelian philosophy, but failed for their overzealous aspirations (the Panthers lost their bearings and community support when they became common criminals).

The third goal is mass uprising. This can take the form of protest or strike, preferably the latter in order to proliferate a blame game. If, for example, the longshoremen’s union can be persuaded to lock up the docks, or the Teamsters can be sufficiently riled to block food transport, there is a real crisis for which “the bosses” can be blamed . General strikes of this nature have notably occurred in Seattle (1919) and San Francisco (1934), but also recently in Spain and Italy. The discomfort of garbage strikes, mail strikes, and the like is a constant reminder that workers need to be treated fairly, if for no other reason than Marxists lie in wait for every opportunity to exploit the exploited.

Protests are effective also. The recent (2011) Wisconsin public employees tumult is evidence that dissatisfaction is eternally with us, even among the fortunate who own contract jobs, relative high wages, and taxpayer-funded health benefits. Do not for a moment think these were all Marxists, but do not be deceived that Marxists did not agitate every second, hoping for some escalation on which to pin police brutality.

Once the Hegelian dialectic is fully understood (and it’s not as difficult as some say), every protest, every revolt, every riot can be understood from two perspectives: (1) there is true oppression in this world, (2) Marxists have, through infiltration into various segments of society, a sensitive network which hears and anticipates, if not instigates, every rumble of dissent. For this reason, Marxism always has the upper hand. It is not that Marxists are more caring, but that their opportunities lay in dark places usually not investigated by true problem-solvers until too late. By the time the public is aware of a potential fiery conflict, it has been exaggerated, mistranslated, and transformed into a grandiose power play by the communist.

6. It used to be in America that communism was almost universally viewed as evil; and that if a communist gave a public speech, a patriotic crowd pulled the plug on the offending microphone. Freedom-lovers used to recognize communism as treason against liberty. But today, our children are “educated” by the communist dialectic, our media utilizes this method to destroy dissent, our elected officials are embroiled in it at every turn, and our religious freedom is assailed by it (for example, Christmas carols are verboten but Wiccan rituals embraced). Even radical Islam uses the Hegelian dialectic to blame, claim, and inflame. Shall we now allow our entire nation to be swallowed by Marxism while proudly flying the flag of all-inclusiveness?

Some have interpreted this downward spiral as an opportunity to embrace a choice between liberty and security, but Benjamin Franklin wisely noted, “Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.” However, the Prussian model of crackdown on radicals is not desirable for a free society. First, the idea that Christianity (or any religion) should be upheld by governmental force is neither constitutional nor godly. Second, criticism of government is both a good thing and protected free speech. Ironically, these guaranteed freedoms are utilized by communists to spread their filth by print, airwave, and bandwidth. We are thus nearly trapped by our own goodness, and prisoners to our ideals as defined by our enemies.

Yet, there is a solution. It is “We, the people” who must by vigilance and personal action stem the rising tide of master racism. We cannot and should not depend on government for this. It is our responsibility to learn and teach liberty, through God’s Law and Constitution, to our family, friends, and neighbors; to take positions on local school boards and other important posts; to bend the media (including the Internet) as much as possible to the message of individuality over collectivism.

7. In 1843, Marx published On the Jewish Question. In this important treatise, fellow Hegelians argued over the nature of capitalism, property rights and religion. The document’s gist is that Judaism is to blame for most or all societal and/or economic woes, and is the obstacle to the communist’s ultimate goal, the utopian state. Marx took the position that the religion of Judaism had strangled “the state” by its supposed focus on all things monetary. In fact, Marx called the “Jewish god” money:

Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew. Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.”

The “secret of his religion” also happens to be the target of Marx’s frustration: capitalism (self-interest and practical need). Taking the position of the Catholic Church (!), Marx regarded usury (charging interest) as sinful. In medieval times, the Church did not allow Christians into the money-lending occupations, but Jews were not forbidden and in fact encouraged. That Jews took these opportunities speaks more for their marginalization than for any natural or religious inclination to become usurers. Yet, when economic hard times inevitably came (the Church was notorious for profiteering on fiat money), the Jews were in unenviable positions of blame. This led to expulsions and pogroms against them. Marx gathered this history, as well as philosophical planks of questionable validity, and produced a modern-day superstition against Judaism (promotion of “evil capitalism”), and therefore the Jews.

According to On The Jewish Question, it is Judaism which causes the Jew to be a Jew, and which “pollutes” the Christian to also be a Jew, that is, capitalistic:

“The Jew has emancipated himself in a Jewish manner, not only because he has acquired financial power, but also because, through him and also apart from him, money has become a world power and the practical Jewish spirit has become the practical spirit of the Christian nations. The Jews have emancipated themselves insofar as the Christians have become Jews.”

The charge is that Christians must oppose Judaism on two grounds: (1) capitalism is evil, (2) Christianity is superior to Judaism:

“In its perfected practice, Christian egoism of heavenly bliss is necessarily transformed into the corporal egoism of the Jew, heavenly need is turned into world need, subjectivism into self-interest.”

Naturally, Marx was not blind to his own manipulations. The goal was obviously to incite Christians against Jews, in the same manner that the Catholic Church permitted the Jews to take the blame for currency crashes and banking debacles during the Middle Ages*. Marx’s claim was, however, original in that its core principle rested on the Jew’s nature. There is no doubt that Marx believed the Jew incapable of separating himself from his religion, and, insofar as he caricatured Judaism as “huckstering,” Marx laid the groundwork for a new level of blame, to the DNA of the Jew. In this case, it would be not only the collapse of regional banking or currencies, but also the failure of societal evolution, which would be placed directly at the feet of Judaism and Jews, including all non-Jews who participated in capitalism.

* This information is widely available, even in (seriously) Conspiracy Theories and Secret Societies (For Dummies).

The key to this scheme is, of course, the destruction of capitalism. Historically, this has been attempted or accomplished by three major avenues: (1) direct opposition (strikes, riots, et al), (2) establishment of a socialist society (Scandinavia, Canada, et al), (3) establishment of communist tyranny (Russia, et al). However, we currently face newer, sophisticated “inside job” techniques within China (capitalism? - I don’t think so) and the United States (“we’re all socialists now”). The abolition of religion is the cornerstone to the plot. Theoretically, once Judaism and “polluted” Christianity are rendered an anachronism, capitalism is dead (Marx’s view of Islam is of special interest and will be studied at a later time).

8. As a product of Hegelian dialectic, the responsibility for economic turmoil is not initially rested on persons taking part in the credit system, only on the Jew (or pseudo-Jew). This is the worst type of syllogism. Imagine a merchant being blamed for the habit of smoking, that the ill effects of cigarettes exist only because someone sells them. This is madness and the worst type of irresponsible behavior.

Let us widen this net. The Marxist dialectic pushes that the current recession (2007-on) is to blame on the banking industry (Marxist code: the Jews). However, no responsibility is placed upon unworthy applicants who received loans for which there was no personal historical basis of credit, wages, or even community morality. Even the government is by the communist mostly exonerated, although various federal agencies (working through Marxist petitioning) pressured banks to show “compassion” for certain potential borrowers. The motivation for the politician to participate was a mixture of phony glory (essentially, self-aggrandizement for a continued career in politics) and real payoffs (“campaign contributions” and “ground forces”). The loan recipient did not become a transformed human being by this handout. His or her bad credit and/or poor wages were not magically improved.

In reality, the banks were responsible only for caving to monstrous government pressure. Nevertheless, the incessant Marxist squealing is directed towards these entities rather than at the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), FNMA, or Congressional oversight committees (among many villains). And the political class, eager to retain power, is satisfied to allow such misguided missiles. And the American people, as dupes, cry in solidarity for those whose lives were shattered. This all feeds the Hegelian dialectic, and pushes the Marxist concept of “blame the Jews” to newer heights, the ultimate goal being the destruction of capitalism and the establishment of “a better system.”

This mortgage debacle is in fact an extension of the communist-laden “public housing” concept. Before the “projects” became big business in the 1960’s, impoverished individuals were expected to pull themselves up by hard work and the grace of God. That some groups were targeted and excluded from various avenues is not disputed, but it is likewise that blacks (for example) were able to find self-respect by achievement. True, many failed but we can imagine more from their circumstances than from free choices. With public housing, many succumbed to the “gimme” attitude and simply stopped trying. Public housing therefore became a failure and a disgrace. The CRA only moved this public housing mentality to the next level, the McMansion phenomenon (“You deserve a house, not just a free apartment!”). It is not difficult to see how government-driven lax banking structures and aggressive marketing suckered even the responsible to abandon the affordable American dream for distended utopia. This is a prime (or sub-prime – ha ha) example of Marxism and the administration of the Overton Window, here at work in the housing industry.

9. On the Jewish Question not only invokes old lies and superstitions against the Jews, it also propagates a scientific argument that they are genetically predisposed to capitalism. This establishes Marxist foundation for eugenics and genocide. An “inferior” race which cannot help being evil must be eradicated out of mercy, not malice! Communism is therefore not liable for murder!! The Nazis adopted this exact mindset.

But On the Jewish Question is not scientific in the least. Marx accords a mystical influence to that Judaism and money which he claims “poisons” non-Jews.

If anything, On the Jewish Question is a clarion call to all religions. The message is work together or perish together. For if religions do not band together peacefully against communism, it will be divide and conquer. Remember, “first they came for the Jews, and I said nothing...”

Finally, On the Jewish Question places a wall between Christians and Torah, that is God’s Law. God is invisible, and therefore He cannot be defined, and so can be called a mere superstition. But the Law of God is written, as they say, in stone. This is a problem for the materialist communist. He cannot say the Law is not written. He cannot say collectivism or the dialectic philosophy existed before the Law, and if he does (invoking, for example, Nimrod), he cannot say that it is good or effective. Having thus lost the materialist argument, the communist must begin with dialectic: “The Jew is to blame for our anxiety. The Jew is genetically predisposed to capitalism, which has caused our anxiety. The Jew is an animal, in that he cannot escape his nature to destroy society.” This is the Overton Window regarding religion: Just reject Torah because it is Jewish. No, the truth is that Marxists want you to reject Torah because it is from God. Reject Torah, and they will establish themselves as God. Guess how that turns out?

******************************************************************

Comments welcome. Keep it civil.
You may distribute the above material in any manner you like.

Lesson 2: Marx and Satanism

I hold weekly meetings for interested parties here in Hendersonville, NC. This is a synopsis from our second meeting.

Synopsis of Week 2 Meeting:

1. Is communism atheistic?

It claims so. The core of the communist state is the eradication of all religion, so we believe that atheism is its engine. However, read on.

2. Is communism satanic?

Since Satanism is a religion, one would think not. However, in Marx and Satan, a fascinating book by imprisoned Romanian minister and prolific author Richard Wurmbrand, a solid case is presented that Karl Marx may have been from his adolescence a practicing Satanist. The proof? Correspondence, dramatic writings, third-party accounts, and odd events. Wurmbrand himself says that the verdict is not without doubt, but you will shake your head at the mass of evidence he was able to gather. I recommend you read this book. A synopsis is here:

http://churchmousec.wordpress.com/tag/marx-and-satan/

or read it for free here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/31067286/Marx-and-Satan-Richard-Wurmbrand

3. Does it matter if communism is atheistic or if it is satanic?

Yes. If atheistic, communism is no danger to religion. Atheism is by its very definition neutral to spiritual beliefs. The peril to religious freedom is ANTI-theism, not atheism. Anti-theism is against all forms of worship on the grounds that religion is dangerous. Of course, the methods by which anti-theists would discard religion are equally as oppressive and violent as claims they make against Christianity or Islam (if they had the guts). The key element to removing you from your religion is, as previously stated in last week’s synopsis, to divide you from the rules. Faith can be quite unbreakable but also without firm foundation, so that what is believed passionately can also be gravely in error. On the other hand, God’s rules (Torah), though they may be maligned, distorted, diluted, or absorbed into a different mode, stand on their own merit. The communist is unable to change the written Law of God, which is why infiltration of church and temple at the personal level of faith is their approved strategy. As a prime example, social justice (a communist theme) is often incorporated with Christian theology in order to hoodwink congregants weak in God’s Law. But those who understand with legal precision the Biblical tenets of charity and loving thy neighbor, as well as the more capitalistic themes of investment (for example, the parable of the talents), can never be pulled aside to the doctrines of collective resources or collective salvation.

4. How can one recognize this infection?

It appears from the outset as humanism, that is, rationalism. It begins with benign pleas for “sharing the wealth” as a method to fulfill vague commandments of compassion. If such communitarian behavior is rejected by certain of the flock, they are ostracized. Soon, that church or temple becomes a place of finger-pointing and coveting. This is the route by which Satan becomes involved in communism.

5. What is the communist goal for the church?

Communism denies religion on the basis of economics and so-called reason. Social justice and liberation theology are manners by which communism breaks down the church stone by stone. The actual aim of the communist is the dissolution of the church, not only its infiltration. It is, in fact, the same game that China plays with economics. China is not a capitalist nation; it is only capitalist long enough to wear down capitalism! At that point, when it has become the dominant economic superpower, it will forego capitalism for communism, i.e., slavery.

6. Where does Satanism itself come in?

The satanic angle is the lie. While social justice has its Torah prescription in the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur), the communist view is that no atonement is made without the community, and certainly not without remuneration for past wrongs, that is, by redistribution of wealth. This is false (and therefore satanic).

7. How do we know this?

God’s commandments, and the punishments for their transgression, are written and specific. Further, the oracles (interpreters) of the Law, the Jews (see last week’s synopsis), have a body of knowledge called Talmud. Talmud is intentionally vague and/or seemingly contradictory on a great many subjects. Many times, several diverse opinions confer the same righteousness by nevertheless adhering to a specific commandment. The backbone to this fogginess is that much of Torah was never meant to be absolutist. As it concerns social justice, one may follow such a path, and another not, and both would be within Torah parameters. This “innocent until proven guilty” apparatus has not translated well to the Christian community, which normally functions on singular correctness (“guilty until found innocent”). Thus, preachers such as Jeremiah Wright can spin Talmudic truths into segregationist and racial diatribes by claiming that opposing viewpoints are – you guessed it – satanic. In terms of lawful adherence to God’s Law, this is tripe. In terms of communism, this is propaganda. Likewise, liberation theology would not float without the false promise that the poor are so favored by God that all men must forego even their individual freedom to help these vulnerable (a doctrine known as “option for the poor”). The insidiousness is not that the poor must receive care (this is Torah commandment) but that religious organizations should form to specifically protect their interests. Fundamentally, this is exploitation of the poor. Combined with communism, this is for the sake of gaining power over men. What would Jesus do? Note that when Mary’s use of an expensive ointment was called into question (“it might have been sold and the proceeds given to the poor”), Christ immediately intervened with an admonishment to the grumblers (“the poor will always be with us”).

8. Why is Torah the antidote?

Communists are among us. They have not your best interests at heart. Their goal is destruction of the church and temple by the utilization of its inner workings. Communist infiltration into the government works the same way – topple it from the inside. They work this magic by promising everything, and it is the gullibility and greed of human nature which allows such promises (lies) to take root. Only knowledge based in God’s Law can dull the luster and appeal of satanic offerings posing as communist utopian outlooks, again posing as godly measures. Take Christ’s experience as your template. In the wilderness, when confronted by Satan who offered him all things, Jesus quoted verbatim three times from Torah: (1) “Man shall not live by bread alone but by every word which proceeds from the mouth of God” (Deuteronomy 8:3), (2) “Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God” (Deuteronomy 6:16), and (3) “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve” (Deuteronomy 6:13 & 10:30). Satan promptly fled, and Christ collapsed from exhaustion, having expended all his energy in rejecting sin. How did Jesus recognize the devil? Was “old scratch” carrying a pitchfork and sporting a tail? Did he smell like brimstone and cackle like an old hag? No. Satan comes not in repulsiveness but in attractiveness. If you think that Jesus was not in his human nature able to be tempted, you misunderstand the lesson and underestimate your enemy. Christ was able to discern the serpent only through a Torah prism. How did Jesus retain his righteousness? Jesus wasn’t laughing at a weak foe but fought and thwarted Satan with the powerful sword of written commandment. Concerning this weapon, Christ said, “I did not come to send peace but a sword” (Matt. 10:34), and this sword is the word of God (Hebrews 4:12, et al), which even for the non-Jews Paul did not deny (Ephesians 4:12). If you value your spiritual liberty, you will invoke God’s Law against both communists and Satanists.

*****************************************************************

Comments welcome. Keep it civil.
You may distribute the above material in any manner you like.


Wednesday, September 28, 2011

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals


In 1963, Congress took up the subject of sedition and communist takeover in the United States. This was 48 years ago, but notice how far gone we are.

***********************************************************************

Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963

Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10, 1963 .

Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:

[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.


Congressional Record, Vol. 109 88th Congress, 1st Session Appendix Pages A1-A2842 Jan. 9-May 7, 1963 Reel 12

***********************************************************************

POSTSCRIPT: On June 17, 1963 the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that any Bible reciting or prayer, in public schools, was deemed unconstitutional.

Monday, September 26, 2011

Lesson 1: Marxism

I hold weekly meetings for interested parties here in Hendersonville, NC. This is a synopsis from our first meeting.

Synopsis of Week 1 Meeting:

1. What is communism?

An end result.

2. Why do communists insist that there has never been a communist state?

Because they've never been able to get past stage 1, the violence.

3. Why does there need to be a violent stage?

Because it is the only way to get capitalists out of power. You don't think they're going willingly, do you?

4. What is capitalism?

According to Marx, it is a genetic disease.

5. Who carries this disease?

According to Marx, Jews.

Before you go purple, I am a Jew, and I am telling you this to educate you about communists NOT Jews!

6. Why did Marx say this?


He made it up. He looked at the mixed history of medieval Judaism, the Christian church, and socio-economics, and decided to inflict his philosophy/scheme against his own people (Marx was born Jewish).

7. Why would people believe this?

Christians were by the church historically denied the career of banker or financier. They "allowed" the Jews to do this. When the economy fell apart in any region, the Jews were blamed. Mix this with superstition against Jews and you have a cultural bias that was/is easy to manipulate further.

8. Do communists believe this today?

Yes. The corollary is that any Christian or other non-Jew who embraces capitalism must be... get ready... a Jew by proxy. Therefore, communists believe that the only way to rid capitalism from the Earth is to segregate Jews, reeducate non-Jews, and finally have their revolution.

9. Why would Christians fall for this?

First, Christians have a great weakness when it comes to rules. They tolerate too much evil, and they guess too much about right and wrong. Second, whether you like it or not, the old prejudices against the Jews is alive and strong today. Not only in Europe and the Middle East, but here in America, as anti-Zionism, anti-banker, anti-Israel, etc.

10. Am I being too harsh?

No. Look at Islam. Strong in rules, scary to everyone, including communists. Jews, strong in rules, but weak in numbers and not scary - a convenient target. So, rather than blaming savagery on those who commit it, the weak-minded point their finger at those who are least willing or able to take over the world - the Jews. The communists and Islamic radicals count on this weakness of mind. Guess who really wants to take over the world?

11. What about Nazis?


They believe not only that capitalism is a Jewish plot, but also that COMMUNISM is a Jewish plot! Thus, they are insane.

12. Are communists insane?

They are... but not in philosophy. They are actually very clever. Whereas Nazism is based on the master racism of ethnicity (Aryan), communism is based on the master racism of ideology. They claim to be more scientific and analytical than either capitalists or Nazis.

13. What can be done?

Christians - learn your rules. Read Romans 3:1-2, Matthew 23:2-4, John 3:14 (research this brazen serpent in Exodus and 2 Kings), Acts 15:20-21. Understand where Christianity comes from (the Jews) and understand that communists not only want you to reject Jews but also Judaism and law. This will make you easy pickings. Unfortunately, you have been taught weak law, but Jesus, the apostles, and Paul taught STRONG Law. God's Law. Torah Law. If you want to win against communism and Islamic radicalism, you'll have to be stronger than just complaining about savagery - you'll have to enforce it. Remember - the final goal of communism and Islamic radicalism is for you to reject Jesus - and since Christ and his disciples were Jews, this is supposedly made easier. Finally, Jesus was not a Jew-hating Jew, he LOVED his people. What will you do?

14. Why this focus on Jews?

Why not? Marx was a Jew by birth, but left it because he hated God. Jesus was a Jew and did not leave it. The difference between the Truth and lies is quite clear. Jesus is the truth IF we listen to him. Marx is a liar - period. The Jews are to be of great concern not only in the next year or so, but also in the end times. This is written in scripture, and we know it. The real reason the communists want to destroy religion is that the Law of God, the RULES, must be expunged before the state can truly become "god." But if you've read the verses I've recommended and studied them, you'll see that communism can never win when a people are strong not only in faith, but also in the Law of God, the true RULES.

******************************************************************


Comments welcome. Keep it civil.
You may distribute the above material in any manner you like.